Bare Acts Sections and Orders
IEA Section 155 - Impeaching credit of witness - Printable Version

+- Bare Acts Sections and Orders (https://section.org.in)
+-- Forum: Central And State Acts (https://section.org.in/forumdisplay.php?fid=78)
+--- Forum: Indian Evidence Act (https://section.org.in/forumdisplay.php?fid=84)
+--- Thread: IEA Section 155 - Impeaching credit of witness (/showthread.php?tid=1463)



IEA Section 155 - Impeaching credit of witness - Legal Flag - 01-31-2023

The credit of a witness may be impeached in the following ways by the adverse party, or, with the consent of the Court, by the party who calls him: --

(1) By the evidence of persons who testify that they, from their knowledge of the witness, believe him to be unworthy of credit;

(2) By proof that the witness has been bribed, or has 1[accepted] the offer of bride, or has received any other corrupt inducement to give his evidence;

(3) By proof of former statements inconsistent with any part of his evidence which is liable to be contradicted;

2*                                          *                                              *                                          *                                                         *

Explanation.-- A witness declaring another witness to be unworthy of credit may not, upon his examination-in-chief, give reasons for his belief, but he may be asked his reasons in cross-examination, and the answers which he gives cannot be contradicted, though, if they are false, he may afterwards be charged with giving false evidence.

Illustrations

(a) A sues B for the price of goods sold and delivered to B.

C says that he delivered the goods to B.

Evidence is offered to show that, on a previous occasion, he said that he had not delivered goods to B. The evidence is admissible.

(b) A is indicted for the murder of B.

C says that B, when dying declared that A had given B the wound of which he died.

Evidence is offered to show that, on a previous occasion, C said that the wound was not given by A or in his presence.

The evidence is admissible.




1. Subs. by Act 18 of 1872, s. 11, for "had".

2. Clause (4) omitted by Act 4 of 2003, s. 3 (w.e.f. 31-12-2002).